Evidence applied with someone in front of you.
Coaches, clinicians and dietitians answer to a person, in the room, today. Titrate keeps the research you rely on organized as positions you can hand over — with the sources attached.
Titrate is pre-launch. What is described here is what it is being built to do, with Jeff Casebolt, PhD.
The central question
Does passing objective return-to-sport (RTS) criteria/test batteries (strength symmetry limb-symmetry indices, hop tests, time-based thresholds, etc.) before returning to sport reduce an athlete's risk of a second ACL injury (graft rupture or contralateral tear)?
- Grindem et al.2016n=106supports
- Kyritsis et al.2016n=158supports
- Webster et al.2019n=—mixed
- Losciale et al.2019n=4 studies po…contradicts
- Zhou et al.2024n=9 studiesmixed
- Paterno et al.2022n=159contradicts
What this category has in common
When you are accountable to a client, a patient or an athlete, being right is not enough — you have to be able to show your work, at the moment they ask. That is a different problem from searching the literature, and it is the one this category is built around.
A workbench, not a chatbot.
Nothing here writes a confident paragraph for you to trust. There is no chat window. You keep the judgment; the tool keeps the trail back to the papers. It cannot hallucinate a citation because it does not generate citations at all — a claim points at a paper already sitting in your own library, or it points at nothing.
How Titrate works
Bring the papers, or start from the topic. Group them into the questions you actually get asked. Write positions with the citations attached. Publish under your own name — a workspace holds eight surfaces, from the library to the answer you send a client.
The whole mechanism, and what a workspace holdsTitrate is pre-launch.
Join the practitioner waitlistOne email when the first practitioner cohort opens. Nothing else.
